Forums Knowledge Base Knowledge Base Articles 95 – BRIGHT STARS THAT SHOULDN’T BE

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
  • #88024

    admin
    Participant

    Software Bisque Knowledge Base Article – 95

    BRIGHT STARS THAT SHOULDN’T BE

    ISSUE

    These stars have been reported to be far too bright, or nonexistent:

    GSC 2709:2822, 21h05m54.8s +3459’28” (J2000), Mag. 2.5.
    (DSS indicates should be mag. ~7.9)
    GSC 6453:1224, 03h36m56.4s -2808’15” (J2000), Mag.~1.5.
    (should be mag. 15, as IS inside ~35FOV!)
    GSC 8661:2283, 13h12m57.5s -5949’22” (J2000), Mag. ~0.1.
    (should be mag. 6.4)
    GSC 4338:1916, 03h16m15.8s +7424’03” (J2000), Mag. 7.4.
    (doesn’t appear in DSS, nor observations; 1 of 3 in equi-distant line)
    GSC 4338:1887, 03h16m23.8s +7424’27” (J2000), Mag. 10.55.
    (doesn’t appear in DSS; 2 of 3 in equi-distant line – Non-Stellar)
    GSC 4338:1895, 03h16m08.4s +7423’42” (J2000), Mag. 14.79.
    (doesn’t appear in DSS; 3 of 3 in equi-distant line – Non-Stellar)

    RESOLUTION

    As we learn of, and verify certain stellar magnitude errors, we sometimes correct these in subsequent CD-ROM editions. If the user does not have the most recent CD-ROM edition, updating may resolve some, or all of these problematic data.

    APPLIES TO

    Database

    KEYWORDS

    SBKB

    This article was formerly published under the identifier Q202KB in Software Bisque’s prior knowledge base.

    Last Reviewed: 11/24/2004

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

The forum ‘Knowledge Base Articles’ is closed to new topics and replies.